NC Historical PE Ratio image   This NC PE ratio history page last updated 5/23/2022
NC Historical PE Ratio Chart
PeriodPriceGAAPAnnualizedPE
Q1 2022
5/4/2022
48.781.726.887.1
Q4 2021
3/2/2022
32.001.074.287.5
Q3 2021
11/3/2021
32.043.4713.882.3
Q2 2021
8/4/2021
26.700.913.647.3
Q1 2021
5/5/2021
23.761.255.004.8
Q4 2020
3/3/2021
27.140.873.487.8
Q3 2020
11/2/2020
19.861.144.564.4
Q2 2020
8/5/2020
23.170.863.446.7
Q1 2020
5/7/2020
29.590.883.528.4
Q4 2019
3/4/2020
40.440.913.6411.1
Q3 2019
10/30/2019
58.451.475.889.9
Q2 2019
7/31/2019
53.151.144.5611.7
Q1 2019
5/1/2019
40.812.158.604.7
Q4 2018
3/6/2019
37.081.576.285.9
Q3 2018
10/30/2018
29.621.335.325.6
Q2 2018
8/1/2018
33.000.923.689.0
Q1 2018
5/2/2018
35.401.184.727.5
Q4 2017
3/7/2018
41.750.753.0013.9
Q3 2017
11/1/2017
40.150.491.9620.5
Q2 2017
8/1/2017
14.940.863.444.3
Q1 2017
5/2/2017
18.350.843.365.5
Q4 2016
3/1/2017
15.413.8015.201.0
Q3 2016
11/1/2016
16.842.7010.801.6
Q2 2016
8/2/2016
12.560.632.525.0
Q1 2016
5/4/2016
13.530.692.764.9
Q4 2015
3/2/2016
11.803.3213.280.9
Q3 2015
11/3/2015
10.620.451.805.9
Q2 2015
8/5/2015
12.15-0.04-0.16NA
Q1 2015
5/5/2015
11.060.140.5619.8
Q4 2014
3/9/2015
12.203.5214.080.9
Q3 2014
10/29/2014
12.331.024.083.0
Q2 2014
7/30/2014
11.89-0.47-1.88NA
Q1 2014
4/30/2014
12.24-0.19-0.76NA
Q4 2013
3/4/2014
13.922.8511.401.2
Q3 2013
10/30/2013
12.811.546.162.1
Q2 2013
8/7/2013
13.860.632.525.5
Q1 2013
5/1/2013
12.180.532.125.7
Q4 2012
3/6/2013
12.682.8111.241.1
NC PE History Chart
PeriodPriceGAAPTTMPE
Q1 2022
5/4/2022
48.781.727.176.8
Q4 2021
3/2/2022
32.001.076.704.8
Q3 2021
11/3/2021
32.043.476.504.9
Q2 2021
8/4/2021
26.700.914.176.4
Q1 2021
5/5/2021
23.761.254.125.8
Q4 2020
3/3/2021
27.140.873.757.2
Q3 2020
11/2/2020
19.861.143.795.2
Q2 2020
8/5/2020
23.170.864.125.6
Q1 2020
5/7/2020
29.590.884.406.7
Q4 2019
3/4/2020
40.440.915.677.1
Q3 2019
10/30/2019
58.451.476.339.2
Q2 2019
7/31/2019
53.151.146.198.6
Q1 2019
5/1/2019
40.812.155.976.8
Q4 2018
3/6/2019
37.081.575.007.4
Q3 2018
10/30/2018
29.621.334.187.1
Q2 2018
8/1/2018
33.000.923.349.9
Q1 2018
5/2/2018
35.401.183.2810.8
Q4 2017
3/7/2018
41.750.752.9414.2
Q3 2017
11/1/2017
40.150.495.996.7
Q2 2017
8/1/2017
14.940.868.201.8
Q1 2017
5/2/2017
18.350.847.972.3
Q4 2016
3/1/2017
15.413.807.822.0
Q3 2016
11/1/2016
16.842.707.342.3
Q2 2016
8/2/2016
12.560.635.092.5
Q1 2016
5/4/2016
13.530.694.423.1
Q4 2015
3/2/2016
11.803.323.873.0
Q3 2015
11/3/2015
10.620.454.072.6
Q2 2015
8/5/2015
12.15-0.044.642.6
Q1 2015
5/5/2015
11.060.144.212.6
Q4 2014
3/9/2015
12.203.523.883.1
Q3 2014
10/29/2014
12.331.023.213.8
Q2 2014
7/30/2014
11.89-0.473.733.2
Q1 2014
4/30/2014
12.24-0.194.832.5
Q4 2013
3/4/2014
13.922.855.552.5
Q3 2013
10/30/2013
12.811.545.512.3
Q2 2013
8/7/2013
13.860.63NANA
Q1 2013
5/1/2013
12.180.53NANA
Q4 2012
3/6/2013
12.682.81NANA
Quotes delayed 20 minutes

Email EnvelopeFree NC Email Alerts:
Get Dividend Alerts
Get SEC Filing Alerts
10 Most Oversold S&P 500 Stocks
10 Most Overbought S&P 500 Stocks
10 ETFs With Stocks Insiders Are Buying
10 ETFs With Most Upside To Targets
The DividendRank Top 25
Warren Buffett Dividend Stocks
10 Cheap Dividend Stocks Under $10
10 Top DividendRank'ed Energy Stocks
The 10 Highest Yielding Preferred Stocks
The 10 Highest Yielding Preferred Stocks
The 15 Most Active S&P Call & Put Options
NACCO Industries (NC) is categorized under the Materials sector; to help you further research PE history across stocks, below are some other companies in the same sector:

NEM PE Ratio History
NEU PE Ratio History
NGVT PE Ratio History
NP PE Ratio History
NTIC PE Ratio History
NUE PE Ratio History
NVT PE Ratio History
NX PE Ratio History
OC PE Ratio History
OI PE Ratio History
How should the NC historical PE ratio be determined?
Realizing that PE stands for Price to Earnings ratio, we need two values to compute it: stock price and earnings per share. The stock price at any given date is a known historical value, but what about the earnings number to use?

✔️Accepted answer: There are a number of different approaches when it comes to calculating a historical PE ratio for a company like NACCO Industries. We like to take our measurements on each of the past quarterly earnings reports. That only leaves the question of whether the earnings number at that quarterly report should be used on an annualized basis, or some other method. We approach this question using three different methods, on this NC Historical PE Ratio page.

What is the average historical PE for NC based on annualized quarterly earnings?
As we look back through earnings history, what is the resulting PE calculation if at each measurement period we use that quarter's earnings result annualized?

✔️Accepted answer: The NC historical PE ratio using the annualized quarterly earnings method works out to 6.4.

What is the average historical PE for NC based on trailing twelve month earnings?
As we look back through earnings history, what is the resulting PE calculation if at each measurement period we use the trailing twelve months combined earnings result in the calculation?

✔️Accepted answer: The NC historical PE ratio using the TTM earnings method works out to 5.2.

What is the average historical PE for NC based on median TTM earnings?
As we look back through earnings history, what is the resulting PE calculation if at each measurement period we use the median earnings over the trailing twelve months and annualize that median result in the calculation?

✔️Accepted answer: The NC historical PE ratio using the annualized median TTM earnings method works out to 5.6.

On this page we presented the NC Historical PE Ratio information for NACCO Industries' stock. The average NC historical PE based on using the annualized quarterly earnings result at each measurement period (for the "E" in the PE calculation; and the closing price on earnings date as the "P") is 6.4. Meanwhile, using the trailing twelve month (TTM) quarterly earnings result as our method of calculation the "E" value at each measurement period, the average NC historical PE based on this TTM earnings result method is 5.2. Note: any PE calculations involving negative earnings were discarded as not meaningful.

Let's now compare this NC historical PE result, against the recent PE: when this page was posted on 5/20/2022, the most recent closing price for NC had been 51.98, and the most recent quarterly earnings result, annualized, was 6.88. Meanwhile, the most recent TTM earnings summed to 7.17. From these numbers, we calculate the recent NC PE on 5/20/2022 based on annualized quarterly EPS was 7.6. Based on NC's history, that recent PE is elevated relative to the historical average, with the recent PE 18.7% higher than the historical average PE across our data set for NACCO Industries. Looking at the recent NC PE on 5/20/2022 based on TTM EPS, we calculate the ratio at 7.2. Based on NC's history, that recent PE is elevated relative to the historical average, with the recent PE 38.5% higher than the historical average PE across our NACCO Industries data set with TTM EPS used in the calculation at each period.

Another interesting NC historical PE Ratio calculation we look at is to take the median earnings per share of the last four quarters for NC, and then annualize the resulting value... with that annualized number then being used in the PE calculation. To walk through this math for NC, we start with the past four EPS numbers and we first sort them from lowest to highest: 0.91, 1.07, 1.72, and 3.47. We then toss out the highest and lowest result, and then take the average of those two middle numbers — 1.07 and 1.72 — which gives us the median of 1.40. Basically the way to think about this 1.40 number is this: for the trailing four earnings reports, 1.40 marks the "middle ground" number where NC has reported a value higher than 1.40 half the time, and has reported a value lower than 1.40 half the time. Annualizing that median value then gets us to 5.6/share, which we use as the denominator in our next PE calculation. With 51.98 as the numerator (as of 5/20/2022), the calculation is then 51.98 / 5.6 = 9.3 as the NC PE ratio as of 5/20/2022, based on that annualized median value we calculated.

For self directed investors doing their due diligence on NC or any other given stock, valuation analysis for NC can greatly benefit from studying the past earnings and resulting PE calculations. This exercise can help inform an analysis as to whether the past earnings trajectory and current versus historical PE ratios justify the current stock value.

That's why we bring you HistoricalPERatio.com to make it easy for investors to investigate NACCO Industries PE history or the past PE information for any stock in our coverage universe. And in your continued research we hope you will be sure to check out the further links included for earnings surprises history (beat/miss data) as well as next earnings dates for NC. Thanks for visiting, and the next time you need to research NC Historical PE Ratio or the ratio for another stock, we hope you'll think of our site, as your go-to historical PE ratio research resource of choice.

Recommended: VIG Historical Stock Prices, Funds Holding LNKD, Top Stocks Held By Jeremy Grantham.

 

NC Historical PE Ratio | www.HistoricalPERatio.com | Copyright © 2020 - 2022, All Rights Reserved

Nothing in HistoricalPERatio.com is intended to be investment advice, nor does it represent the opinion of, counsel from, or recommendations by BNK Invest Inc. or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or partners. None of the information contained herein constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio, transaction, or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. All viewers agree that under no circumstances will BNK Invest, Inc,. its subsidiaries, partners, officers, employees, affiliates, or agents be held liable for any loss or damage caused by your reliance on information obtained. By visiting, using or viewing this site, you agree to the following Full Disclaimer & Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Video widget and market videos powered by Market News Video. Quote and option data delayed at least 15 minutes; stock quote data powered by Ticker Technologies, and Mergent.